To blind taste or not to blind taste?
Author: Anne McHale MW
Blind tasting is very difficult. I am well-qualified to make this statement, having experienced the challenges of the Master of Wine course over the past few years. I have sat through numerous 12-wine mock exam sessions, during which I sometimes got the wines spot-on, and sometimes so drastically wrong that I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry! I have also seen fellow students who are top winemakers or industry specialists get the wines as spectacularly wrong as I did. Clearly, blind tasting is a really tricky business. So what’s the point of it? I would like to argue that it’s absolutely crucial when you’re learning about wine….but equally it is NOT the be-all and end-all.
In our Berrys’ Wine School, blind tasting plays a very important role. We want our students to focus on the liquid in the glass, rather than be swayed by the price or brand. This allows them to focus on what they really like, rather than thinking ‘oooh, that’s the posh one, it’ll be much nicer’ or ‘I hate Chardonnay so I definitely won’t like that one’. It encourages them to broaden their horizons and move beyond their usual favourites. Without this it is impossible to take advantage of the glorious diversity of wine, which for me is what makes it so utterly fascinating. One of our most interesting experiments takes place in our Champagne Wine School, where guests are given the chance to taste blind a range of Champagnes from famous houses alongside each other. Without fail, there are always people who prefer a different brand to the one which they would normally choose – and they may even find that they don’t like their favourite as much as they thought. This suggests that they are more influenced by the brand, the prestige and the image than the liquid itself.
This comes as no surprise to me at all and is certainly not something which indicates that you aren’t a very good wine taster. It is well-documented that, even for experts, sensory perceptions when it comes to wine are very, very difficult to separate from other layers of understanding about that wine. Prestige, history, a great story – all of these have been shown to improve our perception of the actual taste of the liquid. That’s not to say that the liquid in many expensive wines ISN’T superior to cheaper wines – in blind tastings I do usually manage to pick out those which really stand head and shoulders above the others, without any clue about the label – but not always. I find this fascinating.
I am immensely privileged to work here in the historic heart of Berry Bros. & Rudd, and to have the opportunity to taste the world’s finest wines. Doing it as part of a job, though, means that you rarely get the chance to savour the wines as you would at home – but unfortunately drinking the same wines at home is much too expensive! Imagine my excitement, then, when a few years ago I was able to take the remains of a bottle of 1990 Château Margaux to share with my brother. We looked upon it with awe and wonder, relished every single drop and still have the empty bottle enshrined on top of a kitchen cupboard. The question I would like to ask is this: if someone had sneakily replaced the liquid in the bottle with Berrys’ Good Ordinary Claret, would we have enjoyed the experience any less? Possibly, since there’s no doubt that 1990 Château Margaux is a sensational wine – but then again, possibly not; I remember less about the actual taste of that wine than I do about the ritual of drinking it and the reverence with which we treated it. This may lead you to think, well, what on earth is the point of paying a huge amount for a Cru Classé Bordeaux if you could just stick a fancy label on an everyday drinking claret?
Sometimes, after blind tasting, this thought does indeed cross your mind. But so what if our sensory perception is enhanced by other elements of a wine’s story? We are human, and our sensory perception is only one element of the totality of the experience of being alive. So what if the knowledge that we are drinking a First Growth enhances our enjoyment of the liquid? So what if that fruity but ultimately bland Provence rosé only tastes amazing because we are drinking it on holiday by the sea in Nice, and if we bring a bottle home we wonder what on earth we liked about it? Bring it on!! It’s all part of being alive and all part of the multi-faceted wonder of wine.
A colleague of mine once mused that perhaps, in decades to come, understanding of wine chemistry will have advanced to such a degree that a rare gem like 1961 Château Latour could be chemically synthesised. This leads us to ask a philosophical question: would this wine give us the same degree of pleasure? The answer is, NO, of course not! No matter how good it tasted, it would have lost layers upon layers of rarity, history and prestige, which are all part of this wine’s ability to give us pleasure.
So, whilst I maintain that blind tasting is very important when you are learning about wine, and whilst it will always remain a cornerstone of the Berrys’ Wine School approach to education, I would also like to say this: enjoying wine is about much, much more than tasting fermented grape juice. Revel in every single aspect of it.
Hello!
Thank you so much for this most interesting article from a true expert wine taster. I will feel a lot more encouraged in blind tasting the wines at my friends next sessions.
Best wishes,
Juergen Franz
Thanks for this article, I’m fascinated by the subject. While I consider that blind tasting isn’t everything it does throw up a lot of questions with regards to quality. I can’t help thinking that we, the wine industry, are stimulating the demand-driven prices in the fine wine market by exaggerating the extra quality achieved by the worlds best producers. Indeed, we virtually deify certain wines, imparting almost spiritual meaning to them. Isn’t it the case that the worlds most expensive wines and many less expensive, (but still ‘super-premium’) are only marginally ‘better’ than a plethora of mid-priced wines from good sites with sound viticultural and oenological practices (I use the word ‘better’ with some caution).
The very fact that blind tasting is so hard tells us that the differences are perhaps not as great as the price differential would imply.
Thanks for your comment Paul. The above is very relevant and is a question frequently raised by our wine school students. Producers of wines such as the First Growths of the Médoc undeniably put a great deal of effort into quality: they keep yields low, they operate stringent fruit selection policies and they invest heavily in the vineyards and winery; all of this contributes to high-quality wines. However I agree with you that this does not necessarily mean that their very high prices are matched by an equivalent increase in ‘tasting pleasure’ versus a Second or Third Growth. Yet we must remember that these wines are sold in a marketplace, and that what they are ‘worth’ depends not just on the intrinsic quality of the liquid, but on what purchasers are prepared to pay. The First Growths are now international luxury brands as much as they are top-quality wines. That’s (another!) reason why learning about wine is so great – it gives us the confidence to look beyond the really famous names, and if we don’t want to pay high prices we have the requisite knowledge to seek out hidden gems of excellent quality.
There are many things to say about the values of blind tasting experiences, though it’s most important value is to teach/train the taster to think about what is in the glass and Not what is on the label.
I personally do not feel that there is much value in the exercise out side of some control group of wines. What region, vintage, verities etc. Totally random blind guessing games don’t serve much professional purpose further than a parlor game.
In today’s global wine market there are such a vast array of wines available to the trade from every corner of the wine producing world it is almost impossible for a budding wine professional to spot certain wines out in a blind tasting, especially at a basic commercial level of wine, other than ..is it a good wine of good value.
Let’s face it..not many people could be an expert of the best estates of Mendoza and Pauallic enough to pick 12 out of 12 in a blind tasting.
Where a blind tasting is of great value is where the professional is required to buy something from a group of wines from a difficult vintage. I’ll date my self a bit, but I was faced with that issue with 1972 Bordeaux. I had to buy something! I knew there had to be a pony in the pile of ….. somewhere, and I found it. 1972 Chateau Pauvie – Saint Emilion.
Through the process of tasting dozens of ’72 Bordeaux blind ( a very tough vintage in Bordeaux) I was able to find a excellent wine that presented remarkable value to my customers. Most people had almost complete written the vintage off and were dumping it any way they could.
By conducting several blind tastings where I was not influenced by what I thought a wine should be via prestige and focused only on what was in the glass, we got it right.
Yay I general to blind tastings, but beware when tasting large numbers of wines as it’s easy to be distracted by ‘big’ characteristics and therefore miss subtlety